Vadim Smirnov

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 1,138 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: killswitch on connection loss #12274
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    Could you please check if v.1.2.9 meets your expectations?

    in reply to: killswitch on connection loss #12273
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    Hmm, yes, I think it makes sense. I will create an update over the weekend.

    in reply to: erroe info->pModuleName && info->pModulePath #12267
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    Thanks, I have added a validation for these fields.

    in reply to: Fail to GetTcpipBoundAdaptersInfo #12264
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    Have you tried to run any of the test binaries? For example, dnstrace?

    in reply to: how to use wiresock? #12262
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    Could you share the config file you are having trouble with? Another question, did you test adapter (-lac) or adapterless mode?

    Regarding mysqld, do you mean that it initiates an outgoing connection? Because otherwise, i.e. mysqld listen for the incoming connections and needs to be reachable through the tunnel, binding to the address of the VPN adapter will probably suffice.

    in reply to: permit allowed apps to access LAN #12261
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    I use DisallowedIPs to exclude my LAN (192.168.1.0/24) for Chrome:

    AllowedApps = chrome
    DisallowedIPs = 192.168.1.0/24
    in reply to: Fail to GetTcpipBoundAdaptersInfo #12260
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    Hi!

    Have you installed Windows Packet Filter driver?

    in reply to: how to use wiresock? #12252
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    I will add a proxy option. This can be really useful.

    Wiresock VPN Client is standalone, you don’t need the official Wireguard client to make it work.

    WireSock VPN Gateway needs an official Wireguard client and allows it to act as a WireGuard server.

     

    in reply to: how to use wiresock? #12249
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    The problem was parsing a configuration that expected the Address parameter to have a specified netmask, e.g. Address = 10.10.0.4/32, 2001:dc8:a260::4/128 while in your configuration the Address parameter looked like Address = 10.10.0.4 , 2001:dc8:a260::4.

    I have fixed the configuration parser in 1.2.8. Please give it a try.

    in reply to: how to use wiresock? #12248
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    Please check if you have received my reply email.

    in reply to: how to use wiresock? #12246
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    Problems with -lac options are caused by insufficient user privileges, please note that Wiresock should be run as administrator.

    You can email PCAP files directly to support@ntkernel.com. We can continue to review the issue privately, after which I will post the final solution here. Unfortunately, without anti-spam, I would have to delete too many users/spam daily…

    in reply to: how to use wiresock? #12244
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    Hello, could you please provide the generated PCAP files in addition to the application log? Also, could you check if using-lac makes a difference? With the latter option, Wiresock works closer to the stock client. One more question, do you have DNS specified in the config file (‘server not found’ points to DNS problem)?

    Currently, only the process name is checked, the path is ignored. It’s easy to change the check to a fully qualified pathname, but in the current implementation with a config file, this can lead to unwanted collisions. I plan to add an advanced configuration that will allow this.

    You definitely read in my mind! I really was considering adding a proxy (as a dedicated process) that would be connected and intercepted by Wiresock. I implemented a similar thing for one side project.

    in reply to: WireSock SOCKS5 Issues #12240
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    I’m afraid something is wrong with your Dante server configuration. Unfortunately, it is difficult to guess and advise.

    in reply to: WireSock SOCKS5 Issues #12238
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    Check if you allowed configured UDP port range on Dante server machine, e.g. for 40000-45000 range it can be done by the command below:

    iptables -I INPUT -p udp --dport 40000:45000 -j ACCEPT

    in reply to: WireSock SOCKS5 Issues #12236
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    According to the wiresock log, the authentication and UDP ASSOCIATE commands succeeded, but the handshake packet did not reach its destination. Most likely, it was blocked by the firewall (iptables or VPS provider). Please check this post for configuration details. They are specific to the Oracle cloud, but should be close to any other VPS.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 1,138 total)