Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,471 through 1,485 (of 1,509 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: IOCTL_NDISRD_SET_EVENT and Win32 events #5550
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    Please refer CNdisApi::SetPacketEvent regarding translating Win32 event to Ring0 event under Windows 9x/ME.

    For Windows NT/2000/XP/2003 you can create Win32 event in kernel with ZwCreateEvent and pass it to driver. In order to wait on this event you should first get event object with ObReferenceObjectByHandle call.

    Hope it helps…

    in reply to: address translation #5544
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    However, are there any special thinks to consider when using your pkt filter ??

    I’m not sure what you actually mean here, but there is no technical problems to realize NAT using WinpkFilter.

    in reply to: Re-routing TCP packets #5533
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    If you mean packet sent to localhost (127.X.X.X) then the answer is NO. These packets (actually they never have the form of packets with IP and TCP headers, just chunks of data) are processed internally by TCP/IP and never reach NDIS level.

    in reply to: Re-routing TCP packets #5531
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    It looks that something was wrong when processing the packets below:
    PCA <- SYN/ACK <- PCB
    PCA <- SYN/ACK <- PCB
    and connection was terminated due to time out. I would try to check what happens there.

    in reply to: Dropping on default #5543
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    It can be done in the custom build if you own Developer license.

    in reply to: Re-routing TCP packets #5523
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    After outgoing packet modification I would indicate it to MSTCP instead sending it over the network.

    Hope it helps…

    in reply to: Unmanned install #5541
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    Yes, sure. the only thing you should do is creating some registry entries (please find the details in the WinlkFilter docs).

    in reply to: WinPKFilter, performance and user/kernel mode #5499
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    I’m trying to find the best driver model to use, which kind of driver do you suggest to use as a model?

    This is not hardware driver, so for Windows NT/2000/XP/2003 you should use NT legacy driver, which sceleton can be generated using something like QuickSYS (http://www.ntkernel.com/resources.shtml). For Windows 98/ME you can use VToolsD framework to generate the driver sceleton.

    in reply to: problem with winpkfilter #5493
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    I think you can create the dedicated working thread and perform packet processing in this thread. In this case you won’t block your main thread.

    in reply to: WinPKFilter, performance and user/kernel mode #5497
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    Sadly I cannot afford the price now. I’ve already bought the developer license and I hope I will be able to use it in a kernel mode solution. I just need a start point, an example using winpkfilter in kernel mode or a way to avoid the overhead passing packets to user mode.

    If you have kernel mode expirience then using IOCTL interface from the kernel mode should not be a problem for you. Otherwise, it may appear even more then difficult. You will have to create two drivers (SYS for NT/2000/XP/2003 and VxD for Windows 9x/ME, please refer relative DDKs for the details).

    If it looks too difficult then you should try to optimize user-mode packet processing or upgrade (upgrade fee is 2000USD) to Source Code license(in this case you also won’t avoid kernel mode development, but you will be able to create cross-platform packet processing code using ready WinpkFilter interfaces).

    in reply to: WinPKFilter, performance and user/kernel mode #5495
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    Using IOCTL interface from kernel is very similar to doing it from user-mode. However, if you really need kernel mode solution, the easiest way would be licensing source code and modifying original driver’s code.

    in reply to: problem with winpkfilter #5491
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    There should be no problem with using WinpkFilter from GUI application. As for you problem, then it is probably somethere in your packet filtering code. Hope it helps…

    in reply to: WinPKFilter – new user question #5490
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    Please could somebody confirm that I can achieve the following:

    Parse IP packets on Ethernet and Dial-up adaptors.
    Alter TCP/UDP data (with checksum adjustment).
    Block TCP/UDP packets
    Use MS Visual C++ for development

    Yes, that’s right.

    Will I need different versions of WinPkFilter for different Windows releases (2000, Xp Home, Xp Pro) ?.

    No, there are two helper drivers, one supports Windows 9x/ME, another Windows NT/2000/XP/2003.

    in reply to: Ethernet Bridge not pass WSock connection`s through #5486
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    Ethernet Bridge is free and unsupported tool. There is no warranty that it will work any OS/hardware configuration.

    in reply to: IPSec #5482
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

    When implementing IPSec you need to insert additional headers (AH, ESP) or even incapsulate packets, thats why you need to decrement MTU used by system.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,471 through 1,485 (of 1,509 total)