Vadim Smirnov

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 1,506 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: WinpkFilter Driver v3.0.4 Incompatability Issue On Vista #6662
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

      NDIS IM driver is a standard Windows driver and by design it has a less chance of the software conflict with other third-party applications than NDIS hooking driver. Your case looks like a software conflict.

      in reply to: Winpkfilter Lock up with Kaspersky Internet Security #6648
      Vadim Smirnov
      Keymaster

        Install Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0.0.125 d.f

        We have tested the suggested configuration with Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0.1.325 (the latest one available from the official web site) and have not figured out any problems. May be the problem was specific to 7.0.0.125 and fixed in the current version.

        Could you try to reproduce it after updating KIS to 7.0.1.325?

        in reply to: WinpkFilter 3.0: Wireless Access Failure #6657
        Vadim Smirnov
        Keymaster

          Could you try to completely uninstall Symantec software and check if problem with WinpkFilter disappear? This would help to identify the problem.

          in reply to: WinpkFilter 3.0: Wireless Access Failure #6655
          Vadim Smirnov
          Keymaster

            You still have not replied if you are using the latest WinpkFilter or ealier builds.

            Try to e-mail us the list of installed drivers/softwares, this may sched some light.

            Vadim Smirnov
            Keymaster

              How can I detect network interface’s status changes? And also enable/disable interface with winpk framework? Is there any details for delphi or c++?

              http://www.ntkernel.com/wpfk-help/setadapterlistchangeevent.htm

              As a second question, can I extract tcp packets from the SSL stream with winpk?

              If this is about HTTPS then by port number 443. If another port used you can try to identify the connection, an example, by SSL certificate sent by server.

              in reply to: WinpkFilter 3.0: Wireless Access Failure #6653
              Vadim Smirnov
              Keymaster

                We are not aware about any problems with wireless adapters and WinpkFilter. However, please ensure that you are using the latest version of WinpkFilter.

                Driver conflict with some other network software is possible and most usual problem of misbehave, details depend from what other third party low level network software you have installed on those systems.

                in reply to: Signing Winpkfilter for vista x64 #6652
                Vadim Smirnov
                Keymaster

                  I’d recommend to sign both CAT file and driver image.

                  in reply to: winpkfilter disable #6647
                  Vadim Smirnov
                  Keymaster

                    INetCfg provides programming interface for network components management.

                    in reply to: winpkfilter disable #6645
                    Vadim Smirnov
                    Keymaster

                      You can uncheck WinpkFilter Service checkbox in the connection properties to disable it (by default the service is not hidden, but in can be hidden in the custom builds).

                      in reply to: Small IP address problem? #6643
                      Vadim Smirnov
                      Keymaster

                        pIPHeader.DestIp := htonl(NewDestIP.S_addr);

                        Don’t do this, you already have IP address in the correct byte order.

                        in reply to: Detecting of application component name #6638
                        Vadim Smirnov
                        Keymaster

                          I had not sad that this is easy, but there is no other way to track the module which actually called the system service.

                          Luckily for the actual winsock calls the stack is easy to restore (number and types of parameters are known) up to the calling module.

                          in reply to: WinpkFilter static filters #6641
                          Vadim Smirnov
                          Keymaster

                            Ну это то как раз очень даже понятно, адрес/порт источника/назначения зависят от направления пакета. Можно было бы сделать более сложные правила (в том числе двунаправленные), но чем проще тем быстрее работает, да и в любом случае сложное правило можно записать как композицию простых.

                            in reply to: WinpkFilter static filters #6639
                            Vadim Smirnov
                            Keymaster

                              Ну как-то вот так:


                              //**************************************************************************************
                              // 1. Outgoing HTTP requests filter: PASS OUT TCP packets with destination IP 64.251.25.36 PORT 80 (http://www.ntkernel.com)
                              // Common values
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[0].m_Adapter.QuadPart = 0; // applied to all adapters
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[0].m_ValidFields = NETWORK_LAYER_VALID | TRANSPORT_LAYER_VALID;
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[0].m_FilterAction = FILTER_PACKET_PASS;
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[0].m_dwDirectionFlags = PACKET_FLAG_ON_SEND;

                              // Network layer filter
                              in_addr address;
                              in_addr mask;

                              // IP address 64.251.25.36
                              address.S_un.S_un_b.s_b1 = 64;
                              address.S_un.S_un_b.s_b2 = 251;
                              address.S_un.S_un_b.s_b3 = 25;
                              address.S_un.S_un_b.s_b4 = 36;

                              // Network mask 255.255.255.255
                              mask.S_un.S_un_b.s_b1 = 255;
                              mask.S_un.S_un_b.s_b2 = 255;
                              mask.S_un.S_un_b.s_b3 = 255;
                              mask.S_un.S_un_b.s_b4 = 255;

                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[0].m_NetworkFilter.m_dwUnionSelector = IPV4;
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[0].m_NetworkFilter.m_IPv4.m_ValidFields = IP_V4_FILTER_PROTOCOL | IP_V4_FILTER_DEST_ADDRESS;
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[0].m_NetworkFilter.m_IPv4.m_DestAddress.m_AddressType = IP_SUBNET_V4_TYPE;
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[0].m_NetworkFilter.m_IPv4.m_DestAddress.m_IpSubnet.m_Ip = address.S_un.S_addr; // IP address
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[0].m_NetworkFilter.m_IPv4.m_DestAddress.m_IpSubnet.m_IpMask = mask.S_un.S_addr; // network mask
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[0].m_NetworkFilter.m_IPv4.m_Protocol = IPPROTO_TCP;

                              // Transport layer filter
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[0].m_TransportFilter.m_dwUnionSelector = TCPUDP;
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[0].m_TransportFilter.m_TcpUdp.m_ValidFields = TCPUDP_DEST_PORT;
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[0].m_TransportFilter.m_TcpUdp.m_DestPort.m_StartRange = 80; // HTTP
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[0].m_TransportFilter.m_TcpUdp.m_DestPort.m_EndRange = 80;

                              //******************************************************************************************
                              // 2. Incoming HTTP responses filter: PASS IN TCP packets with source IP 64.251.25.36 PORT 80 (http://www.ntkernel.com)
                              // Common values
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[1].m_Adapter.QuadPart = 0; // applied to all adapters
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[1].m_ValidFields = NETWORK_LAYER_VALID | TRANSPORT_LAYER_VALID;
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[1].m_FilterAction = FILTER_PACKET_PASS;
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[1].m_dwDirectionFlags = PACKET_FLAG_ON_RECEIVE;

                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[1].m_NetworkFilter.m_dwUnionSelector = IPV4;
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[1].m_NetworkFilter.m_IPv4.m_ValidFields = IP_V4_FILTER_PROTOCOL | IP_V4_FILTER_SRC_ADDRESS;
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[1].m_NetworkFilter.m_IPv4.m_SrcAddress.m_AddressType = IP_SUBNET_V4_TYPE;
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[1].m_NetworkFilter.m_IPv4.m_SrcAddress.m_IpSubnet.m_Ip = address.S_un.S_addr; // IP address
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[1].m_NetworkFilter.m_IPv4.m_SrcAddress.m_IpSubnet.m_IpMask = mask.S_un.S_addr; // network mask
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[1].m_NetworkFilter.m_IPv4.m_Protocol = IPPROTO_TCP;

                              // Transport layer filter
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[1].m_TransportFilter.m_dwUnionSelector = TCPUDP;
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[1].m_TransportFilter.m_TcpUdp.m_ValidFields = TCPUDP_SRC_PORT;
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[1].m_TransportFilter.m_TcpUdp.m_SourcePort.m_StartRange = 80; // HTTP
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[1].m_TransportFilter.m_TcpUdp.m_SourcePort.m_EndRange = 80;

                              //***************************************************************************************
                              // 3. Drop all packets (skipped by previous filters) without processing in user mode
                              // Common values
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[2].m_Adapter.QuadPart = 0; // applied to all adapters
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[2].m_ValidFields = 0;
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[2].m_FilterAction = FILTER_PACKET_DROP;
                              pFilters->m_StaticFilters[2].m_dwDirectionFlags = PACKET_FLAG_ON_RECEIVE | PACKET_FLAG_ON_SEND;

                              Правда, при таком наборе фильтров, к ntkernel.com можно будет достучаться только по адресу http://64.251.25.36, потому что DNS пакеты буду блокироваться. Для того чтобы работала DNS нужно добавить правило разрешающее DNS пакеты. Роутер добавлять необязательно (если конечно он выполняет роль DNS сервера, то можно разрешить к нему полный доступ, и заморачиваться специфическими DNS правилами).

                              in reply to: Detecting of application component name #6636
                              Vadim Smirnov
                              Keymaster

                                The task is very similar to what debugger does when it shows you the call stack. You can try to search for open source debugging tools. Also debugging relative books should be helpful. Personally I like this one http://www.amazon.com/Advanced-Debugging-Addison-Wesley-Microsoft-Technology/dp/0321374460

                                in reply to: Detecting of application component name #6634
                                Vadim Smirnov
                                Keymaster

                                  You can parse the user mode stack of the calling thread. On the top of the stack is usually ntdll.dll and so on.

                                  However, if you are trying to detect Trojan module then it can be a bit complex. It is possible to work with TDI directly thus bypassing most of the user mode network modules. It is event possible to bypass ntdll.dll by replicating necessary system calls in Trojan module. In this case Trojan DLL will be on top of the stack. This makes the task of parsing the call stack quite complex.

                                Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 1,506 total)