Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
I have come to a different solution. I had forgotten my parents upgraded their router last year and it supports openVPN (Not yet new enough for wireguard), so Im just going to have it run as the gateway and use mullvad as intended.
Thanks for the help but this is just simpler for me to troubleshoot and maintain. Wiresock would have been my only choice otherwise.
Would this be in the mullvad tunnel in the wireguard client? The server just has the wiresock gateway and wireguard client for Mullvad. Should I be using the wiresock client and gateway? Changing the AllowedIps on the mullvad tunnel on the wireguard client from ”0.0.0.0/0″ to “0.0.0.0/1, 128.0.0.0/1” did not work. Having just the mullvad tunnel or just the wiresock gateway running works, but not both.
When I setup the gateway, the only way I could get my clients to connect to the internet (Mullvad disabled) was by adding “::/0” to AllowedIps.
1. Im using gateway
2. My server is on a simple LAN, and I have a port forwarded for the Wiresock gateway for me to use Wireguard clients on my phone and PC remotely. Wiresock is configured in NAT mode so I connect to my server with the IPs on the LAN.
I had my Mullvad VPN app installed as well, but when I turn it on, the wiresock connection to my phone and remote PC is lost. Unfortunately, Mullvad doesn’t have the ability to split tunnel to a single app like many other VPNs. I will note that Mullvad VPN uses wireguard protocol as well and I can connect to it with a wireguard client if that makes this any easier.
