lovepkfilter

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 13 posts - 31 through 43 (of 43 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: what’s the time to release new version for winpkfilter #6483
    lovepkfilter
    Participant

      That’t Right!

      hope 3.0.4 can release early.

      some questions:
      1. if i am a license buyer,can we get the both x86 and x64 current version?
      2.can u get me some examples at lease two which use winpkfilter for himself software?
      3.a fool question πŸ™„ ,it is: if i but the winpkfilter for a license,when i send my software which used the winpkfilter, ~~~~~~this’s to say: the winpktilter driver i paid will be published. how to prevent it? πŸ™ πŸ™ 😯 😯

      (software+winpkfilert(licensed))


      >other will be used it


      >other get the winpkfilert(licensed). all right?

      do u have email. i want to ask something about how to buy it~~ 😈

      many thanks!!!!!!!!!!

      in reply to: ARP spoofing #6490
      lovepkfilter
      Participant

        @alex_s wrote:

        Anybody has the ideas on how to resist ARP spoofing aside from:

        “to drop any requests from” and “to drop any replies to” the addresses other than gateway address. The problem is in case LAN is already spoofed it can be tricky to define gateway’s mac address.

        i think we can wait the new version together~ πŸ˜€

        in reply to: what’s the time to release new version for winpkfilter #6481
        lovepkfilter
        Participant

          please,what’is the time for release the new version.

          the flowers had been droped.. πŸ˜₯ πŸ˜₯ πŸ™

          in reply to: what’s the time to release new version for winpkfilter #6480
          lovepkfilter
          Participant

            @SerpentFly wrote:

            SendFlagTcpPacketToTcp(Lastpacket,Flag,fromip,toip,from port,toport);

            It would also need SEQ and ACK. Basically you can write such a function using the existing API completely in user mode.

            oh~~~aha~maybe sorry for my poor Porgrame skill.
            i beg u write out a delphi code for send such code use winpkfilter api.even if it is a send rst packet!

            i can not,yes,i did can not get any message for the examples~

            in reply to: what’s the time to release new version for winpkfilter #6478
            lovepkfilter
            Participant

              Great!

              if you want to test please contract me from bbs message. πŸ™‚

              about the send rst packet,it is very important.
              we known,the firewall’s important point is protect the host. if we deny the bad ip from the host,for the first time,we will see the host remain a port state:Time_wait.

              if we deny many and many ip,the host we get over of the States.

              Then like Time_wait, the windows system will keep it for 20 minuts at last.

              i suggest add one api for winpkfilter. the api can send any Tcp flag packet. by pass in last tcp packet and tcp flag,we can get the buffer. at last,we can send this packet.

              eg:
              SendFlagTcpPacketToTcp(Lastpacket,Flag,fromip,toip,from port,toport);

              just a sample.

              and eg: sendFlagTcppacketToadpatch……

              by the way,how to get the IFS HOOK like winpktilter(NDIS HOOK)?

              reguards!!!!:)

              πŸ˜‰ πŸ˜‰

              in reply to: hi,SerpentFly please come in:about send rawpacket #6469
              lovepkfilter
              Participant

                i means i hope 3.0.4’s winpkfilter could add more characteristic.

                eg: filterinfo or get the packet easy to deal with, after all,many time people are deal with the tcppacket. so How convenient!!!! like checksum,psdtcpheader,winpkfilter can give a temple structure. then not so much people will ask more question like “how to send a raw packet?” etc~~

                best reguard~~ πŸ˜† πŸ˜†

                in reply to: Problem with paths to files (in Kernel Mode) #6457
                lovepkfilter
                Participant

                  @alex_s wrote:

                  @Samael6 wrote:

                  I have found a solution.
                  No more help needed

                  VolumeDeviceToDosName ?

                  3ks alex_s

                  in reply to: hi,SerpentFly please come in:about send rawpacket #6467
                  lovepkfilter
                  Participant

                    good!hope the next version~can u give a release time?

                    byt the way. i did not send out a packet by winpkfilter. 3.0.4 need more Characteristic property for firewall secion. let more things done in ring0 Automationly

                    in reply to: OLE hooking in Windows #6243
                    lovepkfilter
                    Participant

                      @Deneb wrote:

                      Hello,

                      we need a mechanism to detect ( and prevent ) a process from opening a web page using the IWebBrowser / IWebBrowser2 interface via Internet Explorer. It is unclear if we should ( or can ) hook the CoCreateInstance or the methods inside the interface. A preferable method would be to hook the COM server for this interface as I suspect the server is a standalone process. Can anyone help me in this direction?

                      Thanks

                      do u have a result for you question? u can exchange with me: iisfirewall@126.com

                      in reply to: Send Raw Packet. #6463
                      lovepkfilter
                      Participant

                        good!

                        and….~
                        need to be chechsum or is it will be do the checksum by the SendPacketToMstcp or SendPacketToAdapter?

                        by the way,if i want to close the connection,need i send send a rst packet to both MSTCP and Adapter?

                        how to do it (rst packet)?

                        3ks for your best~

                        in reply to: About "500 packets in current version" #6451
                        lovepkfilter
                        Participant

                          hi~
                          Thx very Much!

                          in reply to: About "500 packets in current version" #6449
                          lovepkfilter
                          Participant

                            and~~…

                            because u had said:my app work in usermode. i want t deal with every packet, but it is still will be done in usermode not in the ring0.

                            please tell me System efficiency can Affected much more?

                            in reply to: About "500 packets in current version" #6448
                            lovepkfilter
                            Participant

                              3ks for your exciting answer

                              on the other hand,:) if my net traffice reach on 7mbps,can cause lose packet?may be!

                              i love pkfilter!you are good author!!

                              by the way,when i use pkfilter, i found you alloc 1534 bytes for everypacket,why not 1514?? πŸ˜›

                            Viewing 13 posts - 31 through 43 (of 43 total)