Topic

shadowsocks support

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #13950
    epsi
    Participant

    Please add Shadowsocks as proxy support. It’s impossible to find public SOCKS5 servers that support UDP for the handshake. Additionally, localhost SOCKS support would be appreciated.

    #14491
    iricah21
    Participant

    I agree with this. The UDP side of SOCKS5 is definitely the frustrating part, especially when you’re trying to find a public proxy that actually supports it properly. Localhost SOCKS support would be useful too, since it would make testing with a local proxy much easier.

    Having Shadowsocks support as well would give a lot more flexibility.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.