- This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Absolutely, you can do this. However, during initialization, WireSock identifies the instances of the virtual network adapter, selects the first one to be used for the routing purposes, and renames the selected connection to “WireSock”. This is done for your convenience, allowing you to easily recognize the network adapter currently utilized by the client. If you have any suggestions for improvement, I would be happy to consider them.
Thanks For You’re Answer , i want wiresock use a network adaptor named “Example” (without changing name of that adaptor)
i want do this in c# beacuse my app is written in c#
I’m sorry, but it does not seem reasonable to rename the network interface from ‘Wiresock’ to ‘Example’. Instead, it could be more sensible to name it after the configuration file, which would provide better context and clarity.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.