- This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 10 months ago by Vadim Smirnov. 
- 
		AuthorPosts
- 
		
			
				
December 12, 2022 at 4:08 am #12756Hi, thanks for your great work. I can’t pass the handshake packets through Trojan proxy via v2rayN. 
 WireSock -> SOCKS5 (LAN) -> v2rayN -> Trojan -> VPSUDP is enabled in v2rayN for SOCKS5 incomming connections. 
 v2rayN’s logs shows no incomming conenction and abiviously packets won’t reach the VPS. (checked with tcpdump)December 12, 2022 at 11:36 am #12758The problem is using a locally running SOCKS5 proxy (127.0.0.1:1080). WireSock does not currently support this option, it is assumed that the SOCKS5 proxy is running on another machine. December 12, 2022 at 10:59 pm #12759Thanks for your reply. I tried running v2rayN on my other machine on the same local network, still same result. 
 However, I can see a 190 byte length WireGaurd packet in WireShark has sent from my primary device.In intense DPI restricted environments (e.g. China, Iran), SOCKS5 is long gone. No VPN/Proxy protocol is actually working other than Trojan or VLESS/VMESS. It’s very nice if we see built-in support for other obscured proxies in near future. Off topic: 
 Your website blocked in my country, so I need VPN to access it.
 Your web server also disallows to accept a post or comment from any kind of non-personal IP address.
 I had a really hard time to overcome this issue!December 12, 2022 at 11:58 pm #12761It would be helpful to look at the log/PCAP files, however, I would check to see if the handshake packet is being blocked by Windows Firewall on another machine. Off topic: 
 Your website blocked in my country, so I need VPN to access it.
 Your web server also disallows to accept a post or comment from any kind of non-personal IP address.
 I had a really hard time to overcome this issue!SPAM is a real problem, but I’ve just adjusted the spam protection settings a little, I hope this improves your situation. December 13, 2022 at 1:07 am #12762Thanks for spam detection improvements. I don’t think it’s a firewall issue. I was able to access Telegram over that SOCKS5 proxy. 
 Logs says “SOCKS5 ASSOCIATE SUCCESS port: 1082″ (as before on loopback)
 “wiresock_enc.pcap” consists of bunch of UDP packets all with 200 bytes length forwarded to the SOCKS5 destination. The packets count is equal to the number of “[SOCKS5]: associate_to_socks5_proxy: SOCKS5 ASSOCIATE SUCCESS port: 1082” messages in the logs.I increased v2rayN log verbosity and notice that whenever I close the “wiresock-client.exe” process with Ctrl+C, this will be appeared: 
 “wsarecv: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host”December 14, 2022 at 10:48 am #12763Hmm, looks like the problem is in v2rayN. Perhaps his SOCKS5 implementation has issues with UDP support. 
- 
		AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
